The Goos-Hanchen Shift. When describing total internal reflection of a plane wave, we developed expressions for the phase shift that occurs between the. Goos-Hänchen effect in microcavities. Microcavity modes created by non- specular reflections. This page is primarily motivated by our paper. these shifts as to the spatial and angular Goos-Hänchen (GH) and Imbert- Fedorov (IF) shifts. It turns out that all of these basic shifts can occur in a generic beam.
|Published (Last):||14 January 2006|
|PDF File Size:||11.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.86 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Currently I have known the reflection coef r, will be a complex number and its phase angle will vary with the incident angle theta. Some paper explained this phenomenon as the light penetrates the less-dense medium a little, and re-emerge again, just like it is reflected by some virtual plane in the less-dense, but how can this be explained?
Goos–Hänchen effect – Wikipedia
Or by what mechanism? The best way to understand this phase shift is to solve and study hsift of the Helmholtz equation near the boundary between two dielectric mediums. You don’t quite have to solve the full Maxwell equations: First an intuitive explanation. When total internal reflexion happens, the field isn’t abruptly turned around by the interface, it actually penetrates some distance beyond the interface as an evanescent field.
The phenomenon is actually wholly analogous to quantum tunnelling by a first quantised particle field described by e. Indeed, if you goos-hsnchen a sandwich of lower refractive index material between two higher index materials such that an incoming wave is “totally internally reflected” from the first high-index to lower-index interface, then some of the light tunnels through the sandwich and again propagates freely i.
Goos-Hänchen effect in microcavities
The goos-banchen transmitted through the layer decreases exponentially with layer thickness, as with analogous quantum tunnelling through high but thin potential barrier problems. So, given that shifft field penetrates some distance into the lower refractive index medium, the “effective” interface actually lies a small distance into the lower refractive index medium.
So, in the lower medium, there is a field of the form:. In a fuller vector field analysis done by fully solving Maxwell’s equations, one can work out the Poynting vector and show that such fields do not bear optical power with them.
Goos-Hanchen shift – Jens Nöckel
Instead, they are very like inductive and capacitive energy stores; they of course have an energy density but it shuttles back and forth between neighbouring regions in the medium and so the nett power flux through any surface over a whole period is nought. If we look at an actual, finite, laser incident on an interface, it is not a plane wave.
It has finite extent, so it is a superposition of different plane goos-hancheh which all have different angles of incidences. In optics, we can model the total field by adding all the incident plane waves and all the reflected plane waves together. Because of the different angles and finite extent, there is a coherence effect, which causes the shift glos-hanchen occur.
I am asking about the total reflection case, all incident angle grater than critical angle. So far as I can tell by reading a couple refs, it is a coherent interference effect for an input beam of finite width.
The interference causes the reflected sjift to be slightly shifted from the center of the incoming beam. Now for some details. So, in the lower medium, there is a field of the form: There is also the reflected field: WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance goso-hanchen 6 Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.